University of Technology SydneyFaculty of Education
OVAL Research



Conference Themes
Keynotes
Proposals
Abstracts
Andrew Martin and Ivo Jirásek
Bruce Parr
Christopher Bond and Megan Senque
Ellen Kaiden and Frances Shapiro-Skrobe
Elyssebeth Leigh
Esa Poikela and Sari Poikela
Esther Zaretsky
Evelyn Gullett and Nelson D'Souza
Janet Nagel
John Liptak
Jon Brett and Yoshimi Brett
Joseph Ritter and Stephen Shedd
Joseph Williams
Kaz Stuart
Knud Illeris and Simonsen Birgitte
Noel Powell and Rudi Kimmie
Peter Burridge, Cathryn Carpenter and Brenda Cherednichenko
Satu Öystilä
Tracey-Ann Adonis and Priscilla Sandra Daniels
Papers
Program
Symposium
Exhibition
Venue
Accommodation
Social Events
Register
Presenters
Contacts
Search
Exit the CD
Joseph Williams

Integrating leadership studies with experiential learning theory and practice


Purpose
This paper seeks to examine the integration of leadership studies and experiential learning effects within a semester-length university leadership course.

Methodology
The paper describes and analyses the integration of experiential learning with the teaching of leadership using context, content and culture of a local government setting. The outcomes of a semester’s work are considered in relation to students’ views on the benefits derived from the embedding of experiential learning within a traditional senior-level university course.

Current leadership (and specifically, leadership development) research and experiential learning research are considered and an attempt is made to see if the integration of the two has met with the participants’ approval as shown in four years’ worth of assessment data.

The “Leadership Experience” is described in detail with a focus on the integration issue and the perception of the students on understanding leadership issues during and after the opportunity to practise them within teams.

Without an experiential framework the students would be reduced to learning only from the text, from films highlighting ‘good’ and ‘bad’ leadership and from illustrations from the lecturer’s experiences. Such vicarious learning is less valuable than the real learning facilitated by the experience of being a leader, being a follower and being part of a team.  These issues are considered in detail in the paper.